If your company centers revenue around the output or performance of physical assets, then successful life cycle management of the assets is vital;  and we are all entitled to as much reliability as we can afford but that’s not the question, is it?

The question is about how to quantify reliability, how much reliability is enough, and what the most effective way is of achieving it. And reliability isn’t cheap so the answer can’t be ‘as much as possible’.  And this, my future friends, is precisely where Signar excels.  Using your Actual Cost of Risk data, our experts balance your risk tolerance and premium cost with just the right level of risk retention & reliability control.  We call it Goldilocks Reliability.

Based on the calculated (Goldilocks) level of reliability required and the maturity level of your CMMS or EAM system, our experts can help guide your Failure Management strategy team, in addition to providing specific technologies and methods needed for successful implementation.  Automation is part of the equation so we’ll need to ensure the fitness of your Job Plan and PM libraries in preparation for integration and the ‘Human-Machine Relationship’, cultivated by autonomous systems that provide failure management decision support to plant’s force.

So if you’re ready, the next step is to book your Jaunt to Goldilocks Reliability.  Who has time to take a journey to some nebulous state of bliss when high finance is at stake?  The Journey can cost one or two orders of magnitude more than necessary, and that’s just short-term.  No one really knows where it ends.  So engage with us and participate in a C-Trial or an Upside Workshop because it will likely save you millions.